Leadership
Execs who set strategy and allocate budget. Without them, training hits the ceiling.
Three tracks for three audiences. Execs need a mental model. ICs need hands-on patterns. The wider org needs the cultural setup. Pick one or stack all three. Anchored on Mollick's Leadership-Lab-Crowd. Built to survive without me.
Three internal roles every AI-adopting org needs. Most programs train only the Crowd, hit the 20% ceiling, and stall. The fix: train all three in sequence.
This is also where "secret cyborg" lives. People use AI privately but won't share, because nobody signaled it's safe to admit.
Execs who set strategy and allocate budget. Without them, training hits the ceiling.
A small builder team running experiments. Without them, no examples to teach from.
The 80% using AI in daily work. Without them, only power users benefit.
For execs setting AI strategy. Three-Horizon portfolio framing. Budget defense language. Eval oversight without becoming a bottleneck.
For your 5 to 10 builders. Prompt engineering for production. Eval setup (Braintrust or equivalent). Multi-model routing and cost control. Agent literacy: single-shot vs multi-step vs multi-agent.
For ops, sales, CS, engineering. Daily-use patterns. Prompting for the use case, not the demo.
Generic AI training flatlines after the trainer leaves. This one lives in the knowledge base your team and your AI both work from.
Prompt workshops disconnected from real workflows. Trainer leaves, team forgets. Vendor tutorials that lock you in.
Built on your actual use cases. References in the knowledge base your team and your AI share. Adoption tracked, 30/60/90 follow-up.
Me, an exec sponsor, one Lab lead. Live workshops, recordings, async. Reinforcement at 30/60/90.
Interview 6 to 10 across all three roles. Surface the secret cyborg. Pick highest-leverage Crowd workflows.
Two exec sessions. Lock strategy, allocation, metrics. Signal it's safe to admit you use AI.
Four sessions with builders. Real internal use cases. Eval framework stood up.
Two sessions per team. Use-case prompting. Contribution path back to the knowledge base.
Adoption review. Course corrections on what stuck.
Adoption baseline measured. Lab can run future training. Crowd has references in the knowledge base. Leadership has the diagnostic to flag regressions.
Adoption past 20%, typically 60% to 80%. Secret cyborg shrinks. Lab ships internal tools without outside help. New hires train through the OS.
A 4 to 8 week program that trains three internal roles every AI-adopting org needs: Leadership (execs who signal safety and set strategy), Lab (a small builder team running experiments), and Crowd (the 80% using AI in daily work). Anchored on Ethan Mollick's Leadership-Lab-Crowd framework (Wharton, May 2025). Most programs train only the Crowd, hit the 20% adoption ceiling, and stall. The fix is training all three in sequence.
$10-25k, 4 to 8 weeks, across one to three tracks. Leadership track: 2 sessions, 90 min each, plus async reading. Lab track: 4 sessions, 2 hours each, plus hands-on builds. Crowd track: 2 sessions, 60 min each, plus async references. Scoped against team size and track mix. Quoted in writing within 48 hours of the discovery call.
Most programs train only the Crowd. The Leadership layer never signals that AI use is safe to admit, so the "secret cyborg" pattern dominates (people use AI privately but won't share). The Lab layer never produces internal examples, so the Crowd has nothing to copy. Training all three in sequence, starting with Leadership, breaks the ceiling.
Companies whose AI strategy is set but whose adoption has stalled. Execs who need a mental model. ICs who need hands-on patterns. Wider orgs who need the cultural setup. Mid-market service firms, roughly $5M to $200M+ ARR. Pairs with Fractional Head of AI Transformation engagements where adoption is the bottleneck.
You can, but it underperforms. Leadership track first sets the safety signal. Without it, Crowd training teaches skills people are still nervous to use openly.
Crowd track scales. I've run 50-person workshops. Lab track stays small (5 to 10 builders). Leadership track is the exec layer, usually under 12.
Yes. Everything goes into the shared knowledge base your team and your AI both work from, or your shared drive. You own the curriculum. New hires train on it without me.
Optional. Most clients add it to the Lab track so one or two internal leads can run future Crowd sessions.
The three tracks are the deliverable. These come with the engagement.
Every Leadership, Lab, and Crowd session recorded. Yours to keep, for new-hire onboarding, refreshers, and the team members who couldn't attend live. Training scales without re-engaging me.
The framework documented for internal reuse. Diagnostics, exercises, talking tracks for the exec sponsor. So Lab can run the next training cycle without me in the room.
Weekly drop-in office hours for the first four weeks post-engagement. Live questions, prompt review, workflow troubleshooting. Catches the adoption regressions before they become structural.
Book the call. 30 minutes to diagnose where your team is on the Leadership-Lab-Crowd grid. $10-25k, 4 to 8 weeks.