Score your AI program.
AI programs stall on ownership, sequencing, and accountability. Twelve questions to find out which one is costing you. Your score appears as soon as you finish. The breakdown and what to do about each gap comes by email.
Your result
Send me the breakdown
Your four dimension scores, the specific gap each one points at, and the first thing I would fix. One email. No sequence, no drip, no calendar nag.
On its way.
Check your inbox in the next few minutes. If the score surprised you and you want to talk it through, the call is 30 minutes and free.
The questions come from program management, not from an AI checklist.
I was a Technical Program Manager at eBay, working with directors and engineering managers across roughly a dozen teams to surface risk early and get them aligned on outcomes. Programs got into trouble there for the same four reasons AI work does now. Nobody owned the thing end to end. Nothing was sequenced against what it depended on. No human was accountable for a given output. Nobody could prove it worked.
A low score is not a verdict on your team. It usually means AI arrived as a tool decision and never got a program around it. That is the normal way this goes, and it is fixable in weeks rather than quarters.